Pretty much all I’ve been able to think about this week is Nathan Fielder’s new Elizabeth Holmes documentary, You Can See Everything, and now, thank God, I’ve actually seen it with my own eyes. My main takeaway from this bizarre three-hour masterpiece is that human beings are fascinating in their heartbreaking flaws and endless ego… but I also recorded (literally) every thought I had while watching it. Read them all below, but be warned: spoilers ahead.

Liz! THE Liz! God, I can already tell this husband sucks because he just used the words “radical transparency” about him and Elizabeth Holmes being in a Nathan Fielder documentary. There she is, folks. I’m already bummed out by these kids being in this movie. I need to rewatch Amanda Seyfried as Holmes, stat.

Nathan!!!!! I was just weird to him at a party! I don’t think he noticed, though. Wow, Theranos was really billed as “the iPod of healthcare,” huh. The cut between the description of Holmes’s fraud and her reading to her baby… wild. In fact, this is all… simply wild. Sorry, I don’t have a better word for it than that! As of yet, anyway.

Damn, haven’t heard the name “Sunny Balwani” in a while. Holmes didn’t speak publicly for seven years? I would love to be in a position to offer Nathan Fielder a bagel. LOL, the “Holmes denying she committed a crime” section of this movie has begun. Get her, Nathan! “All I know is my truth” — the most manipulative person you’ve ever met. Sorry if I sound heartless about Holmes being forced to leave her family for prison, but that sadly happens to a lot of moms, most of them without Holmes’s resources or history of large-scale fraud.

Nobody says “wow” quite like Nathan Fielder. This man is so insane. Holmes’s husband, to be clear, not Fielder. Billy Evans (the husband) meeting and falling in love with Holmes after her downfall is either romantic or terrifying, and I’m not sure which. “Yeah, I like women.” Sure. I want to go to the Nathan Fielder school of investigative journalism. Wait, Evans did worry Holmes was scamming him? Obsessed with him trying to plead down the family-wealth allegations. Just sit with it, diva!

God, the lighting of Holmes is (say it with me) wild. Not this frontal shot of Evans at the gym! “So who messed up, then, in this process?” Exactly, Nathan. God, the learned helplessness radiating from Holmes is crazy. These recorded side convos between Holmes and Evans… WHY WOULD YOU LET NATHAN FIELDER INTO YOUR HOME 24/7? “Liz, what? You’ve never lied in your life?” Oscar for Nathan Fielder, immediately.

Bummed out once again at how cute this baby is. Fielder continually just stating the facts of Holmes’s deception and watching her lie to him about it is breaking my brain. “So this is the famous scam device.” LOL. “Well, why choose those words?” We are really getting down to semiotics here, and I’m into it. Lot of debate about what a lie is! “Say what’s there” is advice a lot of people could use.

Okay, so Holmes and Evans are definitively not classic-comedy fans. Fielder playing “Who’s on First?” for Holmes while she holds her baby is making me short-circuit. Ah, the dulcet tones of men explaining comedy. Then again, I guess Nathan Fielder is very qualified. “I trust Billy, and Elizabeth is a lot wiser.” Okay, I guess we are just saying anything! I am so claustrophobic in this theater right now.

Yay, Amanda Seyfried! God, she really ate that role. The Curse mentioned (sort of.) God, these people are insane. Do not let Elizabeth Holmes have a laser!!! Is Fielder going to frustration-cry? I would fully understand and support it if he did. “I’m always being real.” AHHHHHHH! “Sometimes I joke”… Aw, Nathan. Dude, I’m sad. I mean, Holmes should face consequences for her actions, but I’m still sad. Holmes/Evans + AI = 🙁 Sorry, was that… a loose gecko? Evans talking a

Frequently Asked Questions
FAQs 150 Thoughts I Had While Watching You Can See Everything

1 What is 150 Thoughts I Had While Watching You Can See Everything
Its a liststyle article where the writer shares 150 running informal reactions to a film or show called You Can See Everything

2 Is it a review
Not exactly Its more of a livereaction or commentary format It captures jokes questions and observations rather than a structured critique

3 What is You Can See Everything
Its the title of the movie or show the writer is reacting to The article assumes youve either seen it or dont mind spoilers

4 What does thoughts I had while watching mean
Its a popular article format where someone writes down their realtime reactionsfunny confused or emotionalas they watch something

5 Do I need to watch the film first
Ideally yes The piece likely contains spoilers and inside jokes that land better if you know the plot

6 Are there spoilers
Almost certainly Reactionstyle pieces usually discuss plot points twists and endings openly

7 Why 150 thoughts Is that a lot
Its a lotand thats the point The high number makes it feel exhaustive funny and obsessive in a playful way

8 Who writes these kinds of articles
Usually entertainment writers bloggers or fans on sites like pop culture and humor publications

9 Whats the tone of the piece
Casual humorous and conversationallike texting a friend during a movie

10 What are some common types of thoughts in these lists
Reactions to plot twists jokes about characters questions about logic comments on acting or visuals and emotional responses

11 Why do people enjoy this format
It feels relatable and communallike watching along with someone funny who says what youre thinking

12 Whats the benefit for readers
Its quick entertaining and helps you feel connected to other viewers reactions It can also point out details you missed

13 Is this format good for serious film analysis
Not really Its entertainmentfirst For deep analysis look